This Connecticut-focused blog post digs into the saga at 2 Blake Street in Waterbury. A man identified as “S” claims his stepmother held him captive there for over twenty years.
The property sits under contract to JD Homes LLC for $110,000. But ownership records still show Kimberly Sullivan, and that’s tangled up with criminal charges, probate disputes, and a big question: who’ll really own the house in the end?
Explore top-rated stays with no booking fees and instant confirmation. Your dream trip starts here!
Start Exploring Now
Neighbors and folks across Connecticut are watching. Waterbury, Naugatuck, Shelton, Danbury, Bridgeport, Hartford, New Haven, Bristol—people are talking.
What happened at 2 Blake Street in Waterbury
The house at 2 Blake Street looks abandoned, boarded up since February 2025. That’s when S told police he set a fire to escape and finally get free.
JD Homes LLC has the property under contract for $110,000. Public records, though, still list Sullivan as the owner, and it’s not clear if the sale ever closed.
Sullivan faces criminal charges—kidnapping, assault, unlawful restraint, and intentional cruelty. She denies all of it, saying S wasn’t held captive.
For now, S has a court-appointed conservator. It’s a complicated mess, honestly.
Two threads run through this story. One is the sale and who’s in charge of the house. The other digs into probate questions tied to Sullivan’s late husband’s estate.
Current sale status and ownership questions
–
–
–
–
–
Probate filings and heirs
In April, probate filings about Sullivan’s late husband Kregg list S as an heir, along with Sullivan’s two daughters. That’s a change from 2024 probate records, which only named the daughters.
NBC Connecticut reached out to S’s team and Sullivan’s probate attorney. S’s people didn’t comment, and the attorney hadn’t responded yet.
The probate questions make things even messier. Estate rulings could affect who owns the house and who gets any money from a sale.
Criminal charges and civil implications
Sullivan faces charges—kidnapping, assault, unlawful restraint, and intentional cruelty. She denies every allegation.
The legal battle now centers on who can control and profit from the Waterbury house while both the criminal and probate cases play out. With S’s conservator in the mix, decisions about housing, safety, and compensation get even more complicated.
Cases like this ripple out in Connecticut, affecting not just Waterbury but surrounding communities and the whole landscape of housing and probate law.
A wider Connecticut lens: towns watching the case
People all over Connecticut are watching this case. Folks want to know how it might change property transfers, conservatorships, and probate filings.
The Waterbury episode has people talking in a bunch of communities, stretching from the central corridor to the shoreline. The list includes:
- Waterbury
- Naugatuck
- Shelton
- Torrington
- Danbury
- Bridgeport
- Stamford
- Norwalk
- New Haven
- Hartford
- Bristol
- Middletown
Prosecutors, conservators, and potential buyers are navigating where criminal law and civil probate collide. More details will probably come out soon.
For people from Waterbury to Danbury and everywhere in between, the case shows just how tangled property, family disputes, and the legal system can get. It really does make you wonder how these issues ripple through neighborhoods and markets across Connecticut.
Here is the source article for this story: Agreement reached to sell house where Waterbury man says he was held captive for decades
Find available hotels and vacation homes instantly. No fees, best rates guaranteed!
Check Availability Now
Fairfield County
Hartford County
Litchfield County
Middlesex County
New Haven County
New London County
Tolland County
